Segment
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle2. Fulda EcoControl HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP2 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4
Table of contents:
| # | Fulda EcoControl HP2
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R18 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Today, let's delve into a detailed comparison between two popular tyres- the Fulda EcoControl HP2 and the Kleber Dynaxer HP4.
The Fulda EcoControl HP2, created by Fulda and distinctively recognized for being a superior summer tyre, stands with an overall rating of 79%. Known for replacing its predecessor- the Fulda EcoControl HP, it excels in exterior noise reduction and aquaplaning-cross. Various tests like 'GTÜ' and 'Autobild' place this model as position 4 and position 20 respectively, out of a total of 8 and 53 competitors.
On the other end of the spectrum, we have the Kleber Dynaxer HP4, manufactured by Kleber holding an impressive overall rating of 82% as a summer tyre. It shines in comfort, exterior noise reduction, and incredibly even outdoes the Fulda EcoControl HP2 in its location on the 'GTÜ' and 'Autobild’ tests with positions 1 and 14, defeating 8 and 53 contestants respectively.
When sifting through Autobild's 2024 test summary, both tyres showed similar strengths and weaknesses. They were both praised for good environmental balance, wear-and-tear, and efficiency, but criticised for not being fully balanced and weak performance on wet surfaces.
Throughout the variety of tests, the Fulda EcoControl HP2 consistently received commendations for attributes like significantly reduced exterior noise and resistance against aquaplaning. It, however, also displayed recurring weakness with wet surface handling, as pointed out in the Autobild 2024 test.
Nevertheless, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4, despite sharing the same praise and criticism in the Autobild 2024 test, received additional compliments during the Autobild 2022 test for substantial Aquaplaning character traits, short wet and dry braking distances, good driving comfort, and quiet rolling noise. There were also mentions of a delay in steering response and a slight under-steering behavior on dry tracks.
In conclusion, both tyres demonstrate unique strengths and weaknesses, but the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 shows a slight winning edge in overall tests. When deciding which tyre is a better fit, consider these differences and carefully weigh them according to individual requirements and driving conditions.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.582. Fulda EcoControl HP2 12.75
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Fulda EcoControl HP2 Satisfactory2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Fulda EcoControl HP2 70 dB
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | ||||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP2 Rating: Good | dobré | ||||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Good | dobré | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP2 | 36,8 | 29,5 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 37,4 | 28,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 1,3 | 1,8 | ||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP2 Rating: Good | chvalitebné | 2,2 | 2,8 | ||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Good | chvalitebné | 2,1 | 2,8 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | velmi doporučeno | 61 | 48 | 18 | 8 | ||
| Fulda EcoControl HP2 Rating: Recommended | doporučeno | 55 | 46 | 16 | 6 | ||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Highly recommended | velmi doporučeno | 61 | 48 | 17 | 8 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1- | 2+ | 1 | |||
| Fulda EcoControl HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2- | 2 | 2 | |||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2- | 2 | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP2 | 36,0 | 33,8 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 36,2 | 31,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||