Segment
1. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle2. Toyo Proxes CF2 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Toyo). Generally, Firestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (54%) than Toyo (47%). In this particular case, the Firestone Roadhawk has a better rating of 72% compared to 34% of the Toyo Proxes CF2. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 185/65 R15 test, where both the Roadhawk and the Proxes CF2 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Firestone Roadhawk | Toyo Proxes CF2 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R15 - R21 | R14 - R18 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle2. Toyo Proxes CF2 Upper-middle
2. Toyo Proxes CF2 17.5
1. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary2. Toyo Proxes CF2 Satisfactory
1. Toyo Proxes CF2 Satisfactory2. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended
1. Firestone Roadhawk 71 dB2. Toyo Proxes CF2 ? dB
Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,5 | 2,1 | 0,5 | 1,4 | ||
Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 1,5 | 2,9 | 2,5 | 2,5 | ||
Toyo Proxes CF2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,0 | 2,0 | ||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
Firestone Roadhawk | 35,2 | 36,5 | |||||
Toyo Proxes CF2 | 37,8 | 40,5 | |||||
Show test details |