Segment
1. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle2. Sava Intensa HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Sava Intensa HP2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Firestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (54%) than Sava (43%). In this particular case, the Sava Intensa HP2 has a better rating of 75% compared to 72% of the Firestone Roadhawk. The first tyre test of Firestone Roadhawk was done in 2018, compared to 2021 when was the Sava Intensa HP2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the Roadhawk and the Intensa HP2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 96% of Firestone Roadhawk has A wet grip rating, whereas 89% of Sava Intensa HP2 has B rating.
| # | Firestone Roadhawk | Sava Intensa HP2 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R21 | R15 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Sava Intensa HP2 18.25
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary2. Sava Intensa HP2 Good
Worst rating in test
1. Sava Intensa HP2 Satisfactory2. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Sava Intensa HP2 70 dB2. Firestone Roadhawk 71 dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 36,6 | 28,7 | |||||
| Sava Intensa HP2 | 37,2 | 30,0 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Good | 2,7 | 2,8 | |||||
| Sava Intensa HP2 Rating: Good | 2,6 | 2,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,1 | 1,5 | 2,4 | 1,0 | 1,2 | ||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 2,2 | 3,0 | 2,0 | 2,3 | ||
| Sava Intensa HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,0 | 2,3 | 2,7 | 1,0 | 2,4 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 35,7 | 31,6 | |||||
| Sava Intensa HP2 | 36,4 | 33,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||