In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Falken winter tyres are slightly better rated (44%) than Kumho (38%). In this particular case, the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 has a better rating of 61% compared to 55% of the Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro. The first tyre test of Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro was done in 2023, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 245/45 R18 test, where both the EuroWinter HS02 Pro and the WinterCraft WP52 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (95%) of the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 also have B wet ratings.
# | Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R13 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 2- | ||||
Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
Show test details |
Name | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro Rating: Satisfactory | |||||||
Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Rating: Good | |||||||
Show test details |
Name | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro | |||||||
Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | |||||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro | 36,0 | 31,3 | |||||
Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | 36,9 | 31,4 | |||||
Show test details |