• 12 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Falken Azenis FK520 vs. Bridgestone Potenza Sport

# Falken Azenis FK520
/75%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
/89%

Add to comparison

Falken
Bridgestone
DimensionsR17 - R21 R17 - R22
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Let's compare a couple of premium summer tyres suitable for Ultra Ultra High Performance (UUHP) sports, luxurious, and high-performance vehicles - the Falken Azenis FK520 and the Bridgestone Potenza Sport. This comparison is based on the detailed analysis of multiple tyre tests by reputable testing organisations and publications.


The Falken Azenis FK520, manufactured in Turkey, is successor to the Falken Azenis FK510. It's known for its excellent performance in aquaplaning situations, good comfort levels and decent dry handling. However, the tyre has received critiques for slight sluggishness when turning, a little indifferent balance on wet surfaces, and marginally elongated braking distances on dry pavement. Out of all tests considered, it generally ranked towards the middle or lower half of the leaderboard.


In the ACE test, for instance, the FK520 ranked 9th out of 10 tested tyres. In SportAuto's test it placed 7th out of 11, and in Automotorsport's examination, it secured the 7th position among 10 contenders. Its best performance was in Autozeitung's test where it placed 6th out of 9 tyres and in the Gute-Fahrt test where it took the 7th spot among 7 tyres.


On the other side, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport, produced in Poland and Hungary, doesn't have any previous models. It delivers an impressive performance, securing higher ranks in individual tests and featuring strong points such as excellent dry braking and handling, superior wet handling, and superb safety. However, it was marked down for its higher rolling resistance, slightly louder exterior noise and average comfort levels.


During the ACE test, it managed to secure the 4th spot among 10 tested tyres. In SportAuto's test, it finished 6th out of 11, and it came 5th in the roster of 10 tyres examined by Automotorsport. It scored especially well in AutoBild's test, clinching the 2nd spot amongst 13 contenders and in Autozeitung's examination, it landed the 2nd place out of 9 tyres. Lastly, in the Gute-Fahrt test, it took the 3rd position among 7 tyres tested.


When comparing the overall performance based on the tests' outcomes and reviews, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport comes out on top due to its consistently high rankings and better feedback in various aspects. However, your choice should ultimately depend on your specific driving requirements. To explore more about these tyres and other options, visit our Falken summer tyres and Bridgestone summer tyres pages.

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

ACE
Name RatingWetDryRolling resistanceNoise
Best values in testvítěz testu7154197
Falken Azenis FK520
Rating: Recommended
doporučeno6050176
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
Rating: Highly recommended
velmi doporučeno6753155
Show test details
SportAuto
Name Rating
Best values in testvynikající
Falken Azenis FK520
Rating: Good
dobré
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
Rating: Very good
velmi dobré
Show test details
Automotorsport
Name Rating
Best values in testvelmi dobré
Falken Azenis FK520
Rating: Very good
velmi dobré
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
Rating: Very good
velmi dobré
Show test details
Autobild
Name RatingWetDry
Best values in testvynikající2+1-
Falken Azenis FK520
Rating: Good
dobré22
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
Rating: Outstanding
vynikající 2+ 2+
Show test details
Autozeitung
Name Rating
Best values in testvítěz testu
Falken Azenis FK520
Rating: Highly recommended
velmi doporučeno
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
Rating: Test winner
vítěz testu
Show test details
Gute-Fahrt
Name Rating
Best values in testvynikající
Falken Azenis FK520
Rating: Good -
dobré -
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
Rating: Good +
dobré +
Show test details