Segment
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (59%) than Kumho (54%). In this particular case, the Falken Azenis FK510 has a better rating of 74% compared to 48% of the Kumho Ecsta PS91. The first tyre test of Falken Azenis FK510 was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Kumho Ecsta PS91 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Sportscars 2017 235/35 R19 test, where both the Azenis FK510 and the Ecsta PS91 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 69% of Falken Azenis FK510 has A wet grip rating, whereas 94% of Kumho Ecsta PS91 has B rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Azenis FK510 is made in Japan/Turkey and Ecsta PS91 is made in Korea.
# | Falken Azenis FK510 | Kumho Ecsta PS91 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R17 - R99 | R18 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Upper-middle
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Exemplary2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Satisfactory
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Recommended2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Conditionally recommended
2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 ? dB
Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | |||||
Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Recommended | 2+ | 2 | |||||
Kumho Ecsta PS91 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | |||||
Show test details |