Segment
1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Premium2. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle
Comparison: Falken Azenis FK510 vs. Bridgestone Potenza Sport
Table of contents:
| # | Falken Azenis FK510
| Bridgestone Potenza Sport
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Today we are comparing two high-performing summer tyres: Falken Azenis FK510 and Bridgestone Potenza Sport. Both produced by reputable manufacturers, Falken and Bridgestone respectively, these tyres have been through a series of comprehensive tests to ascertain their strengths and weaknesses.
Up first, the Falken Azenis FK510, holding an overall rating of 71%, is a reliable summer tyre manufactured in Japan and Turkey. It has achieved good results particularly in aquaplaning cross, comfort, wet braking, and wet handling categories, as seen in the Autobild test where it took the 5th position among the 8 tyres tested. However, it seems to struggle with handling on wet surfaces and only satisfactory rear axle guidance on dry roads. The Azenis FK510 was replaced by Falken Azenis FK520 to offer improved performance.
The Bridgestone Potenza Sport, on the other hand, emerged with a laudable rating of 89% and is a go-to Ultra High Performance summer tyre. Produced in Poland and Hungary, this tyre outperformed with impressive aptitude in a range of categories including wet circle cornering, dry braking, and handling, among others. Impressively, it finished 2nd in the Autobild test and 3rd in the Sportauto test. Some of its downside includes a high rolling resistance and increased rolling noise. Nonetheless, this does not change the fact that the Potenza Sport stands out for its dynamic wet handling, direct steering response and stable dry handling capabilities.
In conclusion, looking at the comparison between these two tyres, it's clear that while the Falken Azenis FK510 is a decent performer, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport poses as a more superior choice considering all test results and user experiences. Its high-performance features recognition in both dry and wet driving conditions give it a remarkable edge over its competitor.
While our focus was on the Falken Azenis FK510 vs Bridgestone Potenza Sport, it's worth noting that preferences may vary based on an individual's driving style and conditions. Thus, it's advisable to explore and understand what each tyre offers to aid your decision in choosing one that best fits your needs.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Exemplary2. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Very good
Worst rating in test
2. Falken Azenis FK510 Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Falken Azenis FK510 69 dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | |||||
| Bridgestone Potenza Sport Rating: Good | 2 | 2+ | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | |||||
| Bridgestone Potenza Sport Rating: Good | 1- | 2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,3 | 7,2 | 7,2 | 6,3 | |||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Good | 7,5 | 7,7 | 7,5 | 7,2 | |||
| Bridgestone Potenza Sport Rating: Very good | 8,2 | 9,0 | 8,0 | 6,3 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1- | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | |||||
| Bridgestone Potenza Sport Rating: Exemplary | 1 | 1- | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,1 | 5,7 | 5,7 | 6,3 | |||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Very good | 8,1 | 9,2 | 7,5 | 7,3 | |||
| Bridgestone Potenza Sport Rating: Very good | 9 | 8,9 | 9,6 | 6,3 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Recommended | |||||||
| Bridgestone Potenza Sport Rating: - | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
