Segment
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle2. Debica Presto UHP Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Presto UHP vs. Falken Azenis FK510
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (68%) than Debica (58%). The first tyre test of Debica Presto UHP was done in 2020, compared to 2016 when was the Falken Azenis FK510 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 245/45 R18 test, where both the Presto UHP and the Azenis FK510 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Debica Presto UHP has C wet grip rating, whereas 69% of Falken Azenis FK510 has A rating.
| # | Debica Presto UHP
| Falken Azenis FK510
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R18 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Debica Presto UHP | 36,1 | 32,8 | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 | 36 | 30,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
