• 10 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Debica Presto HP2 vs. Kumho Ecowing ES31

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho summer tyres are slightly better rated (54%) than Debica (45%). In this particular case, the Debica Presto HP2 has a better rating of 84% compared to 65% of the Kumho Ecowing ES31. The first tyre test of Debica Presto HP2 was done in 2021, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho Ecowing ES31 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2022 215/60 R16 test, where both the Presto HP2 and the Ecowing ES31 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 94% of Debica Presto HP2 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (69%) of the Kumho Ecowing ES31 also have B wet ratings.

# Debica Presto HP2
/84%
Kumho Ecowing ES31
/65%

Add to comparison

DimensionsR15 - R17 R13 - R17
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Name WetDryNoiseWearFuel consumption
Best values in test2,11,52,41,01,2
Debica Presto HP2
Rating: Satisfactory
2,72,62,91,52,2
Kumho Ecowing ES31
Rating: Satisfactory
2,71,5 2,81,51,9
Show test details