Segment
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle2. Debica Presto HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Presto HP2 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4
Table of contents:
| # | Debica Presto HP2
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
In this comparison, we'll be diving into the performance characteristics, strengths, and weaknesses of two summer tyres: Debica Presto HP2 and Kleber Dynaxer HP4.
Starting off with the Debica Presto HP2, manufactured by Debica, we rated it at 84%, putting it as a strong contender amongst summer tyres. In various tests, this model placed 16th out of 53 in Autobild's test and 7th in the ADAC. Whilst testers recognised its good value for its price, it fell short due to lack of balance and safety issues. An environmental plus is the solid wear and tear performance and its efficiency, but it's undermined by its performance in wet conditions.
On the other hand, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4, manufactured by Kleber, is rated a little lower at 82%. This tyre outperformed the Debica Presto HP2 in Autobild's test, sitting at the 14th position and came in 10th in the ADAC test. This tyre's strengths lie in its comfort, exterior noise control, and environmentally-friendly footprint. Testers noted its satisfactory mileage, wear resistance, and efficiency. Unfortunately, it experienced difficulties on wet road surfaces, which took away from its overall score.
It should be noted that neither of these models have been replaced by newer versions, meaning, these models are still current.
Verdict
When summarising the data from these tests, we can conclude that both tyres have their pros and cons. The Debica Presto HP2 excels in value for price, efficiency, and its performance in terms of wear, while the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 shows strengths in comfort, noise control, and environmental aspects. However, both tyres have room for improvement, notably in their performance on wet roads.
Therefore, your choice between the Debica Presto HP2 and Kleber Dynaxer HP4 should be influenced by your specific needs, with the Kleber model slightly outperforming the Debica in overall rankings.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.582. Debica Presto HP2 12.8
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Debica Presto HP2 Exemplary2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Debica Presto HP2 Satisfactory2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Debica Presto HP2 70 dB
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Debica Presto HP2 | 37,4 | 30,2 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 37,4 | 28,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Enviromental impact | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 1,3 | |||||
| Debica Presto HP2 Rating: Good | chvalitebné | 2,3 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Good | chvalitebné | 2,1 | 2,8 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 2,1 | 1,5 | 2,4 | 1,0 | 1,2 | |
| Debica Presto HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,7 | 2,6 | 2,9 | 1,5 | 2,2 | |
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,7 | 1,5 | 2,8 | 1,5 | 1,9 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1- | 2+ | 1 | |||
| Debica Presto HP2 Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2- | 2 | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Debica Presto HP2 | 36,3 | 31,9 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 36,2 | 31,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||