Segment
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Upper-middle2. Debica Frigo HP2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Debica winter tyres are slightly better rated (53%) than Yokohama (43%). In this particular case, the Debica Frigo HP2 has a better rating of 55% compared to 52% of the Yokohama BluEarth winter V905. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the Frigo HP2 and the BluEarth winter V905 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 61% of Debica Frigo HP2 has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 has C rating.
# | Debica Frigo HP2 | Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R15 - R18 | R15 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Upper-middle2. Debica Frigo HP2 Lowcost
1. Debica Frigo HP2 16.13
1. Debica Frigo HP2 Good2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory2. Debica Frigo HP2 Conditionally recommended
2. Debica Frigo HP2 72 dB
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
Debica Frigo HP2 | 34,2 | 24,1 | |||||
Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 | 32,5 | 26 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1 | 1 | |||
Debica Frigo HP2 Rating: Good | 2- | 2 | 2- | 2 | |||
Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2+ | 3+ | 2- | |||
Show test details |