• 14 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Debica Frigo HP2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Debica winter tyres are slightly better rated (57%) than Kumho (38%). In this particular case, the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 has a better rating of 61% compared to 52% of the Debica Frigo HP2. The first tyre test of Debica Frigo HP2 was done in 2018, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2023 225/45 R18 test, where both the Frigo HP2 and the WinterCraft WP52 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 52% of Debica Frigo HP2 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (95%) of the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 also have B wet ratings.

# Debica Frigo HP2
/52%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
/61%

Add to comparison

Debica
Kumho
DimensionsR15 - R18 R13 - R21
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test31,429,2
Debica Frigo HP237,030,1
Kumho WinterCraft WP5236,931,4
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test32,825,4
Debica Frigo HP237,126,9
Kumho WinterCraft WP5235,927,3
Show test details