Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle2. Debica Frigo HP2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Debica winter tyres are slightly better rated (57%) than Kumho (38%). In this particular case, the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 has a better rating of 61% compared to 52% of the Debica Frigo HP2. The first tyre test of Debica Frigo HP2 was done in 2018, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2023 225/45 R18 test, where both the Frigo HP2 and the WinterCraft WP52 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 52% of Debica Frigo HP2 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (95%) of the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 also have B wet ratings.
# | Debica Frigo HP2
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R15 - R18 | R13 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle2. Debica Frigo HP2 Lowcost
2. Debica Frigo HP2 16.13
1. Debica Frigo HP2 Good2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory
1. Debica Frigo HP2 Conditionally recommended2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
Debica Frigo HP2 | 37,0 | 30,1 | |||||
Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | 36,9 | 31,4 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
Debica Frigo HP2 | 37,1 | 26,9 | |||||
Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | 35,9 | 27,3 | |||||
Show test details |