Segment
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium2. Cooper Zeon CS8 Upper-middle
Comparison: Cooper Zeon CS8 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6
Table of contents:
| # | Cooper Zeon CS8
| Continental PremiumContact 6
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R19 | R15 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
According to tyre tests, the Cooper Zeon CS8 and the Continental PremiumContact 6 testament to their manufacturer's excellent craftsmanship. However, comparison reveals stark contrasts in their performance, reflecting in their overall ratings, where the Cooper Zeon CS8 scored an overall rating of 56% and the Continental PremiumContact 6 achieved a higher rating of 87%.
Comparing their positions in mutual tire tests, the Zeon CS8 consistently took lower positions. In the ADAC test, it took 33rd place out of 50 tyres, while in the Autobild test, it ranked 19 of 52. Conversely, the PremiumContact 6 excelled in the same tests - ranking 2nd in both the ADAC and Automotorsport tests, and clinching the top position in the Autobild test.
Taking a closer look into the strengths and weaknesses of each tyre, the Cooper Zeon CS8, manufactured in GB by Cooper, performed well on wet surfaces but exhibited notable weakness on dry tracks. Particularly highlighted were its deficiencies in terms of tyre wear, environmental efficiency, and overall durability.
On the other hand, the Continental PremiumContact 6, manufactured by Continental in several European countries (SK, DE, CZ), proved its merits across various conditions. The tyre displayed balanced performance and excellent safety scores, with especially commendable performance on both dry and wet surfaces. The PremiumContact 6 also boasted a long service life. Its only noted weakness was in terms of energy efficiency.
The PremiumContact 6 was subsequently replaced by the Continental PremiumContact 7, further contributing to the advancement of the Continental tyre lineage.
In conclusion, while both tyres represent their brands with integrity, the Continental PremiumContact 6 outperforms the Cooper Zeon CS8 in both test rankings and aspectual performance. Suitable for summer use and labelled as a touring tyre, the PremiumContact 6 is an excellent choice for those seeking balanced performance and high safety under various surface conditions. The Cooper Zeon CS8, meanwhile, might be more suitable for those prioritizing wet-surface performance.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Cooper Zeon CS8 19.71
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary2. Cooper Zeon CS8 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended2. Cooper Zeon CS8 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Offroad
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Cooper Zeon CS8 70 dB
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Cooper Zeon CS8 Rating: Sufficient | 3,3 | 3,6 | |||||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Good | 2,6 | 1,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Cooper Zeon CS8 | 38,0 | 34,5 | |||||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 | 36,5 | 29,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Offroad | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Cooper Zeon CS8 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3+ | 2- | 2+ | ||||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Cooper Zeon CS8 | 37,3 | 34,3 | |||||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 | 35,8 | 29,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,4 | 9,8 | 9,3 | 10 | |||
| Cooper Zeon CS8 | 7,1 | 7,1 | 7,2 | 6,9 | |||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 | 8,5 | 8,5 | 8,7 | 8,0 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Cooper Zeon CS8 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | 2- | ||||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 34,6 | |||||
| Cooper Zeon CS8 | 37 | 39,2 | |||||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 | 34,9 | 35 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
