Segment
1. Continental EcoContact 6 Premium2. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Nokian (57%). In this particular case, the Nokian Powerproof has a better rating of 71% compared to 63% of the Continental EcoContact 6. The first tyre test of Continental EcoContact 6 was done in 2020, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian Powerproof first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the EcoContact 6 and the Powerproof were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 52% of Continental EcoContact 6 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Nokian Powerproof also have A wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the EcoContact 6 is made in Germany and Powerproof is made in Finland.
# | Continental EcoContact 6 | Nokian Powerproof | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R13 - R22 | R17 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Continental EcoContact 6 Premium2. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle
1. Nokian Powerproof 7.45
1. Nokian Powerproof Exemplary2. Continental EcoContact 6 Satisfactory
1. Continental EcoContact 6 Satisfactory2. Nokian Powerproof Conditionally recommended
1. Nokian Powerproof 72 dB
Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1+ | ||||
Continental EcoContact 6 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 3+ | ||||
Nokian Powerproof Rating: Conditionally recommended | 1- | 2 | 3- | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
Continental EcoContact 6 | 36,4 | 32,7 | |||||
Nokian Powerproof | 35,7 | 28,9 | |||||
Show test details |