Segment
1. Continental AllSeasonContact Premium2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Upper-middle
Comparison: Continental AllSeasonContact vs. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
Table of contents:
| # | Continental AllSeasonContact | Kumho HA32 Solus 4S | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R20 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Let's compare two all-round tyres, the Continental AllSeasonContact and the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S. Both these tyres have been subjected to extensive tests to evaluate their performance and value-for-money aspects.
The Continental AllSeasonContact, made in Slovakia, Czech Republic, and France, scores slightly higher in our ratings, achieving 76%. A strong performer in snow, this tyre is praised for its braking, handling, and performance in snow cornering. It also stands out for comfortable driving. It fell a bit short on dry roads, showing extended braking distances and understeering. While it provided good economy regarding fuel consumption with reduced rolling resistance, it didn't impress in terms of overall lifespan and cost-effectiveness.
On the other hand, the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S, made in China, scored relatively close to its competitor with an overall rating of 73%. It showcased strengths in snow braking and had a good value-for-money aspect due to its good mileage and price/value ratio. This tyre was also quieter with lower external noise. On the downside, it showed extended braking distances both in dry and wet conditions and performed average in aquaplaning.
When directly compared in tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact generally ranked higher, taking the 8th position in a test of 32 tyres, while the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S was 10th. But the difference between these tyres isn't drastic, making the choice dependent on individual driving needs and vehicle requirements.
In conclusion, both tyres are considerable all-round options. The Continental AllSeasonContact would appeal more to drivers who often drive in snow conditions, seek stability in wet cornering, and prefer a comfortable ride. However, those who are budget-conscious and prioritize mileage and value-for-money might lean more towards the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S tyre.
Please note: Tire performance can vary based on the type of vehicle and driving habits. Always choose the right tire for your driving conditions, and consult with your tire dealer or a professional tyre fitter to ensure the right decision for your vehicle.
Always check if the tyre was replaced by a newer model. Currently, neither the Continental AllSeasonContact nor the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S have a new model on the market. Keep in mind that newer models might come with enhancements and improvements over their predecessors.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S 10.78
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental AllSeasonContact Exemplary2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory2. Continental AllSeasonContact Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow handling
Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow cornering
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Price/value
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,9 | 44,4 | |||||
| Continental AllSeasonContact | 45,8 | 48,9 | |||||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S | 44,4 | 51,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1- | 1 | |||
| Continental AllSeasonContact Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 3+ | 1- | 3 | |||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Rating: Good | 2- | 2- | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Wear | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 1 | ||
| Continental AllSeasonContact Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2 | 2+ | 2+ | 2 | ||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37,6 | 50 | |||||
| Continental AllSeasonContact | 42,3 | 53 | |||||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S | 41,5 | 54,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1 | ||||
| Continental AllSeasonContact Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2- | 1 | ||||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2- | 3+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1 | 1 | |||
| Continental AllSeasonContact Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 1- | 1- | |||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2 | 2+ | 3 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,7 | 45 | |||||
| Continental AllSeasonContact | 43 | 48,6 | |||||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S | 44,3 | 49,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||