Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Premium2. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Upper-middle
Comparison: Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. Kumho Ecowing ES31
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (57%) than Kumho (54%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Turanza T005 has a better rating of 89% compared to 65% of the Kumho Ecowing ES31. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Turanza T005 was done in 2018, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho Ecowing ES31 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2022 215/60 R16 test, where both the Turanza T005 and the Ecowing ES31 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 82% of Bridgestone Turanza T005 has A wet grip rating, whereas 69% of Kumho Ecowing ES31 has B rating. We also know where Turanza T005 is made - Hungary/Poland/France/Italy.
| # | Bridgestone Turanza T005 | Kumho Ecowing ES31 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R22 | R13 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Exemplary2. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Wet side guide
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Dry driving behavior
Dry steering response
Dry lane changing
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Kumho Ecowing ES31 70 dB
Offroad
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel efficiency
Price/value
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,1 | 1,5 | 2,4 | 1,0 | 1,2 | ||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Good | 2,4 | 1,8 | 2,9 | 2,0 | 1,6 | ||
| Kumho Ecowing ES31 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 1,5 | 2,8 | 1,5 | 1,9 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||