• 10 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (57%) than Kumho (54%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Turanza T005 has a better rating of 89% compared to 48% of the Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Turanza T005 was done in 2018, compared to 2016 when was the Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 185/65 R15 test, where both the Turanza T005 and the EcowinG ES01 KH27 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 82% of Bridgestone Turanza T005 has A wet grip rating, whereas 80% of Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 has C rating. We also know where Turanza T005 is made - Hungary/Poland/France/Italy.

# Bridgestone Turanza T005
/89%
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
/48%

Add to comparison

DimensionsR14 - R22 R14 - R17
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Name WetDryNoiseWearFuel consumption
Best values in test1,91,52,10,51,4
Bridgestone Turanza T005
Rating: Good
1,9 1,5 2,92,02,3
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
Rating: Satisfactory
2,82,82,82,02,0
Show test details
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test34,534,3
Bridgestone Turanza T00535,734,3
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH2738,340,4
Show test details