Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Premium
Comparison: Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Bridgestone (57%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Turanza T005 has a better rating of 89% compared to 68% of the Continental ContiPremiumContact 5. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Turanza T005 was done in 2018, compared to 2016 when was the Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 185/65 R15 test, where both the Turanza T005 and the ContiPremiumContact 5 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 82% of Bridgestone Turanza T005 has A wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 has B rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Turanza T005 is made in Hungary/Poland/France/Italy and ContiPremiumContact 5 is made in Czech Republic.
| # | Bridgestone Turanza T005 | Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R22 | R15 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Exemplary2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,5 | 2,1 | 0,5 | 1,4 | ||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Good | 1,9 | 1,5 | 2,9 | 2,0 | 2,3 | ||
| Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,4 | 2,2 | 2,5 | 3,0 | 2,3 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Good | 1- | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 | 35,7 | 34,3 | |||||
| Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 | 36,4 | 36 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||