Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. Fulda Kristall Control SUV Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda). Generally, Fulda winter tyres are slightly better rated (55%) than Bridgestone (46%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has a better rating of 92% compared to 59% of the Fulda Kristall Control SUV. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 was done in 2019, compared to 2018 when was the Fulda Kristall Control SUV first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2020 235/55 R17 test, where both the Blizzak LM-005 and the Kristall Control SUV were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 98% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has A wet grip rating, whereas 69% of Fulda Kristall Control SUV has B rating. We also know where Blizzak LM-005 is made - Italy/Hungary/Poland.
# | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | Fulda Kristall Control SUV | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R14 - R22 | R16 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. Fulda Kristall Control SUV Lowcost
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good
2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,5 | 1,9 | 1,8 | 2,3 | 2,6 | 0,8 | 1,8 |
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory | 1,5 | 3,0 | 2,2 | 2,4 | 3,0 | 2,0 | 1,8 |
Fulda Kristall Control SUV Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 3,1 | 2,6 | 2,4 | 2,6 | 2,0 | 2,0 |
Show test details |