Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium
Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 850P SUV
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (80%) than Bridgestone (46%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has a better rating of 92% compared to 79% of the Continental WinterContact TS 850P SUV. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 was done in 2019, compared to 2015 when was the Continental WinterContact TS 850P SUV first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 235/55 R18 test, where both the Blizzak LM-005 and the WinterContact TS 850P SUV were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 98% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has A wet grip rating, whereas 61% of Continental WinterContact TS 850P SUV has C rating. We also know where Blizzak LM-005 is made - Italy/Hungary/Poland.
| # | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | Continental WinterContact TS 850P SUV | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R22 | R15 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental WinterContact TS 850P SUV Highly recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good
Worst rating in test
1. Continental WinterContact TS 850P SUV Satisfactory2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended
Snow
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good | 1- | 2 | 2+ | 1- | 2+ | ||
| Continental WinterContact TS 850P SUV Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2+ | 1 | 2 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 386 | 143 | 138 | 118 | |||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Highly recommended | 386 | 143 | 136 | 107 | |||
| Continental WinterContact TS 850P SUV Rating: Highly recommended | 382 | 132 | 138 | 112 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2 | 1 | ||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good | 2+ | 2 | 1 | ||||
| Continental WinterContact TS 850P SUV Rating: Good | 2+ | 2 | 1 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||