Segment
1. BFGoodrich Advantage Upper-middle2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Sava summer tyres are slightly better rated (43%) than BFGoodrich (40%). In this particular case, the BFGoodrich Advantage has a better rating of 76% compared to 73% of the Sava Intensa UHP 2. The first tyre test of BFGoodrich Advantage was done in 2021, compared to 2017 when was the Sava Intensa UHP 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the Advantage and the Intensa UHP 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 98% of BFGoodrich Advantage dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (72%) of the Sava Intensa UHP 2 also have A wet ratings.
# | BFGoodrich Advantage | Sava Intensa UHP 2 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R17 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. BFGoodrich Advantage Upper-middle2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Lowcost
1. Sava Intensa UHP 2 11.312. BFGoodrich Advantage 12.75
2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Satisfactory
1. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Still recommended2. BFGoodrich Advantage Sufficient
1. Sava Intensa UHP 2 72 dB
Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1+ | ||||
BFGoodrich Advantage Rating: Good | 2- | 2+ | 2- | ||||
Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2- | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
BFGoodrich Advantage | 36,3 | 31 | |||||
Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 36,3 | 29,8 | |||||
Show test details |