• 10 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Sava Intensa UHP 2

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Sava summer tyres are slightly better rated (43%) than BFGoodrich (40%). In this particular case, the BFGoodrich Advantage has a better rating of 76% compared to 73% of the Sava Intensa UHP 2. The first tyre test of BFGoodrich Advantage was done in 2021, compared to 2017 when was the Sava Intensa UHP 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the Advantage and the Intensa UHP 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 98% of BFGoodrich Advantage dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (72%) of the Sava Intensa UHP 2 also have A wet ratings.

# BFGoodrich Advantage
/76%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
/73%

Add to comparison

DimensionsR14 - R20 R17 - R20
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Name WetDryRunning costs
Best values in test12+1+
BFGoodrich Advantage
Rating: Good
2-2+ 2-
Sava Intensa UHP 2
Rating: Good
222-
Show test details
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test35,727,5
BFGoodrich Advantage36,331
Sava Intensa UHP 236,329,8
Show test details