Segment
1. Kumho Ecsta HS51 Upper-middle2. Avon ZV7 Lowcost
Comparison: Avon ZV7 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS51
Table of contents:
| # | Avon ZV7 | Kumho Ecsta HS51 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R19 | R14 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
In the realm of summer tyres, two quite popular options are the Avon ZV7 and the Kumho Ecsta HS51. Both offer excellent performance, but there are subtle differences between them. Let's take a more in-depth look for a stronger comparison to identify which might be the better option for your needs.
Made by Avon, the ZV7 tyre has managed to obtain a commendable rating of 48% in our tests. As a summer tyre, it delivers great performance, particularly in warmer weather conditions. It has proved itself as a reliable option, placing 17th in a field of 52 tyres in the Autobild test - a testament to its quality and reliability.
On the other hand, the Kumho Ecsta HS51 is a product of Kumho, a well-known manufacturer in the Tyre industry. Made in China, this particular model, despite receiving a slightly lower rating of 45% in our tests, has actually outperformed the Avon ZV7 in the Autobild test, securing a 13th place. It's worth noting that this tyre got replaced by a newer model, the Kumho Ecsta HS52.
When comparing particular aspects, it's found that the Kumho Ecsta HS51 excels in important features such as aquaplaning - both cross and longitudinal, price/value, wet handling, and wet side guide. These features contribute to its excellent performance in wet conditions, making the HS51 a versatile and valuable summer tyre. However, it's important to consider the aspects in which the Avon ZV7 may perform better before making a decision.
After interpreting the comparison data, it would appear that the Kumho Ecsta HS51 could be a marginally better choice overall, particularly regarding its performance in wet conditions and offering better value for money. Yet, it certainly doesn't outshine the Avon ZV7 by leaps and bounds. Therefore, the choice between the Avon ZV7 and the Kumho Ecsta HS51 would arguably boil down to your individual requirements and preferences.
Lastly, it's essential to understand this is based on subjective data comparison. Therefore, it would be advisable to comprehensively analyze the performance, price, and features of both the Avon ZV7 and the Kumho Ecsta HS51 before making a choice that meets your specific needs and ensures your top-most road safety.
Number of sizes available
2. Avon ZV7 58
Number of tests
Best position in test
2. Avon ZV7 8.
Worst position in test
2. Avon ZV7 42.
Average position in tests
2. Avon ZV7 18.55
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta HS51 Exemplary2. Avon ZV7 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta HS51 Satisfactory2. Avon ZV7 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Avon ZV7 ? dB2. Kumho Ecsta HS51 ? dB
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Avon ZV7 | 37,9 | 34,3 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS51 | 34,8 | 30,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Avon ZV7 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | 2 | ||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS51 Rating: Not recommended | 3+ | 3+ | 3+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 34,6 | |||||
| Avon ZV7 | 35,8 | 39,7 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS51 | 36,9 | 38 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||