Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Austone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (38%) than Austone (6%). In this particular case, the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 has a better rating of 55% compared to 6% of the Austone SP901. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the SP901 and the WinterCraft WP52 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Austone SP901
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R14 - R18 | R13 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle
2. Austone SP901 52.
2. Austone SP901 22.2
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
Austone SP901 | 45.7 | - | |||||
Kumho Wintercraft WP52 | 34.6 | 30.3 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Rating | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | vítěz testu | ||||||
Austone SP901 Rating: Not recommended | nedoporučeno | ||||||
Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Rating: Good | dobré | ||||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
Austone SP901 | 37,6 | 30,7 | |||||
Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | 36,9 | 31,4 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,8 | ||||||
Austone SP901 | 41,2 | ||||||
Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | 35,9 | 27,3 | |||||
Show test details |