Segment
1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter Lowcost2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Apollo Aspire XP Winter vs. Sava Eskimo HP2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Apollo winter tyres are slightly better rated (68%) than Sava (61%). In this particular case, the Apollo Aspire XP Winter has a better rating of 82% compared to 75% of the Sava Eskimo HP2. The first tyre test of Apollo Aspire XP Winter was done in 2019, compared to 2017 when was the Sava Eskimo HP2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 225/45 R17 test, where both the Aspire XP Winter and the Eskimo HP2 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Apollo Aspire XP Winter | Sava Eskimo HP2 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R18 | R15 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Sava Eskimo HP2 14.31
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter Exemplary2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow braking
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Sava Eskimo HP2 71 dB
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,8 | 2,0 | |||||
| Apollo Aspire XP Winter Rating: Satisfactory | 2,6 | 2,9 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,2 | 3,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 30,3 | 24,3 | |||||
| Apollo Aspire XP Winter | 35,1 | 25,3 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 36,3 | 25,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 1- | |||
| Apollo Aspire XP Winter Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 2 | 1- | |||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 3 | 1- | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||