Segment
1. Apollo Alnac 4G Lowcost2. Imperial EcoDriver 5 Lowcost
Comparison: Apollo Alnac 4G vs. Imperial EcoDriver 5
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Netherlands (Imperial). Generally, Apollo summer tyres are slightly better rated (47%) than Imperial (17%). In this particular case, the Apollo Alnac 4G has a better rating of 56% compared to 17% of the Imperial EcoDriver 5. The first tyre test of Apollo Alnac 4G was done in 2015, compared to 2021 when was the Imperial EcoDriver 5 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autoklub ČR 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the Alnac 4G and the EcoDriver 5 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Apollo Alnac 4G | Imperial EcoDriver 5 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R16 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Apollo Alnac 4G 18.88
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Apollo Alnac 4G Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Apollo Alnac 4G Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Apollo Alnac 4G ? dB
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 104,7 | 106 | 103,4 | ||||
| Apollo Alnac 4G | 96,7 | 97,3 | 96,1 | ||||
| Imperial Ecodriver 5 | 94,4 | 94,1 | 94,8 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Apollo Alnac 4G | 36,8 | 33,2 | |||||
| Imperial Ecodriver 5 | 37,3 | 36,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||