Nexen N Fera Primus
A very cheap tyre made in Europe with sufficient grip, but very short life. Not sporty. Good for people that don't drive just occasionally.
check Nexen N Fera Primus availability
Table of contents:
Pros and cons
- -
- Low mileage
- Poor handling on dry roads
Customer Popularity
91%
Customer Popularity
Based on 11 reviews
What customers like ...
-
Good price-quality ratio 4
-
Good performance on dry roads 2
-
Quiet and comfortable 2
-
Good performance at high speeds and braking 1
-
Produced in Czech Republic 1
What customers dislike ...
-
Low rolling resistance benefits not noticeable 1
Comparison
Wet road
Dry road - safety
Dry road - sportiness
Mileage
Aquaplaning
Achievements
Best
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Adac 2023
Autobild 2022
Best
Aquaplaning - cross
Adac 2023
Best
Dry braking
Adac 2023
Best
Exterior noise
Adac 2023
Best
Wet braking
Adac 2023
Timeline
2022
Nexen N Fera Primus was launched
2022
Nexen N Fera Primus was tested 2x (Autobild,...)
2023
Nexen N Fera Primus was tested 1x (ADAC)
2024
Nexen N Fera Primus was tested 3x (Autobild,...)
Sizes
Nexen N Fera Primus is made in 44 sizes, starting from 185/65 R15 up to 235/50 R19.
16"
17"
19"
50"
55"
◀
▶
Similar tires
Comparison: tyres similar to Nexen N Fera Primus
Nexen N Fera Primus in tyre tests
All tyre tests where Nexen N Fera Primus was featured:All tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,7 | |||||
| Nexen N Fera Primus | 2,7 | 3,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Nexen N Fera Primus | 37,2 | 27,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
Autobild Summer tyre test 2024 205/55 R16
satisfactory
Ranked #17 of 20
The Nexen N Fera Primus finished in 17th place out of 20 competitors, earning a 'Satisfactory' final rating. This tire was noted for its strong braking performance and dynamic wet handling capabilities. However, it was also criticized for its delayed steering response and limited tire life/economic efficiency. Despite the competition, no specific disciplines or properties were highlighted where the Nexen N Fera Primus was ranked as either the best or the worst among the tested tires.
satisfactory
Ranked #17 of 20
The Nexen N Fera Primus finished in 17th place out of 20 competitors, earning a 'Satisfactory' final rating. This tire was noted for its strong braking performance and dynamic wet handling capabilities. However, it was also criticized for its delayed steering response and limited tire life/economic efficiency. Despite the competition, no specific disciplines or properties were highlighted where the Nexen N Fera Primus was ranked as either the best or the worst among the tested tires.
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nexen N Fera Primus | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Nexen N Fera Primus | 3,1 | 2,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
Autobild Summer tyre test 2022 215/55 R17
satisfactory
Ranked #17 of 21
The Nexen N Fera Primus secured a mid-range position, finishing 10th among 21 competitors. This performance highlighted its exceptional aquaplaning capabilities, specifically in longitudinal resistance, where it outperformed all others. It was praised for its excellent aquaplaning qualities, secure wet handling, and short braking distances on wet surfaces, all offered at an attractive price point. However, its journey wasn't without criticisms; the tire exhibited understeering on dry surfaces, a significantly reduced lifespan, and increased rolling resistance. This balanced set of strengths and weaknesses paints a comprehensive picture of its capabilities across different conditions.
satisfactory
Ranked #17 of 21
The Nexen N Fera Primus secured a mid-range position, finishing 10th among 21 competitors. This performance highlighted its exceptional aquaplaning capabilities, specifically in longitudinal resistance, where it outperformed all others. It was praised for its excellent aquaplaning qualities, secure wet handling, and short braking distances on wet surfaces, all offered at an attractive price point. However, its journey wasn't without criticisms; the tire exhibited understeering on dry surfaces, a significantly reduced lifespan, and increased rolling resistance. This balanced set of strengths and weaknesses paints a comprehensive picture of its capabilities across different conditions.
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1+ | ||||
| Nexen N Fera Primus | 2+ | 2- | 3 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Nexen N Fera Primus | 37,2 | 28,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
Test ratings distribution
| 85% (4x) | |
|---|---|
| Good | Satisfactory |
| 1x | 3x |
Ratings x Wheel size
| R16 | R17 |
|---|---|
| 85% (2x) | 85% (2x) |
Ratings x Width
| 205/xx Rxx | 215/xx Rxx |
|---|---|
| 85% (2x) | 85% (2x) |
FAQ
Is this tyre suitable for SUVs?
Yes, this tyre is also made in SUV sizes.
