215/60 R16 GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ variants
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ is a winter tyre made in total of 177 sizes, ranging from R15 to R15 - this particular dimension is R16, which means it fits to a 16 inch/406.4mm diameter wheel. 215/60 R16 is 20mm wider than the narrowest dimension (195) and 60mm narrower than the widest one (275). This tyre profile of 60 means the sidewall height of the tyre is 60% of the tyre width (215mm), which results in 129mm sidewall height. In 215/60 R16, there is only one possible speed index for GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ - "H", which is good for speeds up to 210 km/h. In 215/60 R16, UltraGrip Performance+ usually competes against Blizzak LM-005, which is a tyre from Bridgestone with a rating of 87%, compared to 82% of the GoodYear in question. Latest test in 215/60 R16 was held by ADAC in 2022, where UltraGrip Performance+ received rating "Good" and finished on the 3. place. It was tested on a Skoda Karoq.
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ is made in 177 sizes, starting from 195/50 R15 up to 275/40 R22.
Similar tires
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ in tyre tests
Relevant tyre tests in same or similiar dimension (215/60 R16)
Ranked #4 of 56
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow |
|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 |
| GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ | 35,5 | 25,5 |
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Rolling resistance | Noise | Wear |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,8 | 1,4 | 1,8 | 1,5 | 2,7 | 1,5 |
| GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ | 2,5 | 2,5 | 1,4 | 2,2 | 2,0 | 2,8 | 2,5 |
| Show test details | |||||||
exemplary
Ranked #3 of 19
Securing a commendable third place among 19 contenders, the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ garnered an 'Exemplary' rating, underlining its impressive capabilities. This premium winter tire stood out for its exceptional performance on snow-covered roads, reflected in its unmatched prowess in snow braking. Alongside, it ensured balanced driving characteristics on both wet and dry surfaces, highlighting its adaptability across varied winter conditions. Additionally, its cost-effectiveness was noted, making it a valued option for consumers. However, it was pointed out that the comfort level provided by the tire was average, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect.
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ | 2 | 2 | 1- | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 8,9 | ||||||
| GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ | 8,9 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
