Dunlop Sport BluResponse is a summer tyre made in total of 70 sizes, ranging from R14 to R14 - this particular dimension is R17, which means it fits to a 17 inch/431.8mm diameter wheel. 205/50 R17 is 20mm wider than the narrowest dimension (185) and 20mm narrower than the widest one (225). This tyre profile of 50 means the sidewall height of the tyre is 50% of the tyre width (205mm), which results in 102.5mm sidewall height. In 205/50 R17, there are 3 possible speed indexes for Dunlop Sport BluResponse - "V","H","W", which are good for speeds up to 240, 210, 270 km/h. In 205/50 R17, Sport BluResponse usually competes against Ventus Prime3 K125, which is a tyre from Hankook with a rating of 75%, compared to 71% of the Dunlop in question.
Relevant tyre tests in same or similiar dimension (205/50 R17)
Autobild Summer tyre test 2024 205/55 R16 good Ranked #10 of 20Securing a mid-table position, the Dunlop Sport BluResponse finished 10th out of 20 competitors in a recent evaluation. Garnering a "Good" final rating, this tyre was praised for its performance in several key areas. Its admirable aquaplaning qualities and short braking distances on dry surfaces were highlighted as major strengths. Additionally, its low rolling resistance stood out, making it the best performer in this particular discipline, which suggests potential fuel-saving benefits for drivers. However, the tyre's grip on wet surfaces was described as average, indicating some limitations under specific conditions. Despite this, the overall balanced performance contributed to its positive assessment in the test.
ADAC Summer tyre test 2023 205/55 R16 good Ranked #16 of 50Securing the 16th position among 50 competitors, the Dunlop Sport BluResponse showed a commendable performance in its category, garnering a final rating of 'Good'. It exhibited excellent handling and efficiency on dry conditions, marking itself as a reliable choice for dry road performance due to its precise steering and short braking distance. However, its performance was not without flaws. The tyre faced criticism for not being fully balanced, demonstrating slight weaknesses on wet roads which led to a downgrade in its overall rating. Additionally, its environmental footprint was also a point of concern, primarily due to its relatively low mileage which further impacted its evaluation negatively. Despite good scores in wear and fuel consumption, and a very positive assessment of its weight, its environmental and durability aspects could not achieve a rating beyond satisfactory. This mixed performance reflects its strengths in providing safety and efficiency on dry pavements while highlighting areas for improvement in wet conditions and environmental sustainability.