185/60 R14 Cooper CS7 variants
No
No
Cooper CS7 is a summer tyre made in total of 59 sizes, ranging from R14 to R14 - this particular dimension is R14, which means it fits to a 14 inch/355.6mm diameter wheel. 185/60 R14 is 30mm wider than the narrowest dimension (155) and -20mm narrower than the widest one (165). This tyre profile of 60 means the sidewall height of the tyre is 60% of the tyre width (185mm), which results in 111mm sidewall height. In 185/60 R14, there is only one possible speed index for Cooper CS7 - "H", which is good for speeds up to 210 km/h. In 185/60 R14, CS7 usually competes against Sincera SN110, which is a tyre from Falken with a rating of 41%, compared to 37% of the Cooper in question.
185/60 R14 82 H
C
E
70dB
| Shop | Product | Stock | Availability | Shipping | Price | Action |
|---|
Cooper CS7 is made in 59 sizes, starting from 155/65 R14 up to 165/65 R16.
Similar tires
Cooper CS7 in tyre tests
Relevant tyre tests in same or similiar dimension (185/60 R14)
ADAC Summer tyre test 2022 185/65 R15
satisfactory
Ranked #15 of 16
Finishing 15th out of 16 competitors, the Cooper CS7 struggled significantly in a recent evaluation, achieving only a 'Satisfactory' overall rating. Despite its relatively low fuel consumption, which could be seen as a positive, the tyre showed weaknesses in crucial areas. It performed poorly both on dry and wet roads, finishing in penultimate place in dry conditions, and was rated merely satisfactory in wet conditions. Furthermore, its wear rate was criticized, indicating increased wear over time. Despite these drawbacks, the tyre failed to excel in any specific discipline, reflecting its overall mediocre performance and rendering it challenging to recommend confidently for drivers prioritizing safety and efficiency.
satisfactory
Ranked #15 of 16
Finishing 15th out of 16 competitors, the Cooper CS7 struggled significantly in a recent evaluation, achieving only a 'Satisfactory' overall rating. Despite its relatively low fuel consumption, which could be seen as a positive, the tyre showed weaknesses in crucial areas. It performed poorly both on dry and wet roads, finishing in penultimate place in dry conditions, and was rated merely satisfactory in wet conditions. Furthermore, its wear rate was criticized, indicating increased wear over time. Despite these drawbacks, the tyre failed to excel in any specific discipline, reflecting its overall mediocre performance and rendering it challenging to recommend confidently for drivers prioritizing safety and efficiency.
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,7 | 1,6 | 2,7 | 1 | 1,7 | ||
| Cooper CS7 | 3,2 | 3,2 | 3,0 | 3,0 | 1,9 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
