See how tyre price relates to test performance at a glance
Hankook Ventus Evo is the sole dry braking leader with a score of 13 — the only tyre in the 20-strong field to reach that level, with all other contenders scoring 12 or 11. A large group of premium and mid-range tyres cluster at score 12 (including Continental, Goodyear, Michelin, Pirelli, and Nexen), making Hankook the clear standout. Actual braking distances in metres were not published for this qualifying round.
Linglong Sport Master leads wet braking outright with a score of 14 — the highest in the field and confirmed by the article, which names it alongside Hankook Ventus Evo and Nexen N'Fera Sport as the three tyres stopping several metres earlier than competitors from 80 km/h. The safety-critical findings are at the bottom: Kleber Dynaxer HP5, Sava Intensa UHP 2, and Yokohama Advan Sport V107 all score only 9 in wet braking (#18), compared to the leader's 14. The article explicitly flags Austone Athena SP-303 and Accelera PHI as accumulating differences of several car lengths in the qualifying round — a real-world stopping hazard.
Kleber Dynaxer HP5 achieves the best rolling resistance score in the entire test (#1, score 15, tied) — yet simultaneously finishes dead last in wet handling (#20, score 7), #18 in wet braking (score 9), and #17 in wet circle cornering. It is the starkest economy-versus-wet-safety trade-off in the field.
Hankook Ventus Evo dominates across disciplines simultaneously: sole #1 in dry braking (score 13), joint #1 in dry handling (score 14), #1 in wet circle cornering (score 13), joint #1 in wet handling (score 14), and #2 in rolling resistance — a breadth of category leadership not matched by any other tyre.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is the only tyre to score 14 in cross-aquaplaning (#1) while also leading longitudinal aquaplaning (score 13, tied #1) and achieving the highest mileage score in the test (15, #1 — a full point ahead of any rival). It tops noise as well, making it the most well-rounded performer outside of wet handling.
Giti GitiSport S2+, a Chinese budget brand, ties for the best longitudinal aquaplaning score in the test (13, #1), leads wet braking (score 12, tied with multiple premium brands), and earns a 'příkladné' (exemplary) overall rating — the same top grade awarded to Goodyear, Michelin, and Hankook.
This test is structured as an Autobild qualifying round: only tyres demonstrating short, reproducibly stable braking distances advance to the full main test. Of 50 entrants listed, those ranked from position 21 onward (including Fulda, Firestone, Uniroyal, and others) did not receive scored disciplines, indicating elimination at this stage.
Pirelli Cinturato C3 and Hankook Ventus Evo share the joint-highest wet handling score in the test (14, #1), yet Pirelli ranks notably lower overall than Hankook — driven by Pirelli's weaker noise score (#20, the worst in the test at 9) and lower dry handling score.
Hankook Ventus Evo is the most dominant single tyre in this test, leading dry braking, dry handling, wet handling, and wet circle cornering simultaneously — a level of cross-discipline dominance not seen from any other entrant, including established premium brands.
Linglong Sport Master — a budget Chinese tyre — leads the entire 20-tyre field in wet braking with the highest score recorded, and is explicitly called out in the article as one of three tyres stopping several metres shorter than the competition from 80 km/h. Its mileage score is however the worst in the test (#20).
Safety warning: Kleber Dynaxer HP5 and Sava Intensa UHP 2 both score best-in-test for rolling resistance yet deliver the worst wet handling and near-worst wet braking results. Buyers should not equate fuel efficiency ratings with overall safety competence.
Yokohama Advan Sport V107 finishes dead last in rolling resistance (#20, score 7) — a significant outlier for a premium brand — and also posts a poor wet braking score (9, #18), making it one of the weakest overall value propositions in this field.
GT Radial SportActive 2 EVO leads the price-mileage ratio ranking (#1, score 14) and ties for best cross-aquaplaning, making it the standout budget value choice for drivers who prioritise aquaplaning safety and long-term running costs.
The article confirms that Austone Athena SP-303 and EP Tyres Accelera Phi accumulated stopping distance deficits equivalent to several car lengths compared to the leaders — both failed to advance and are ranked last in the full 50-tyre qualifying field.
Tests usually don't cover the whole market - here is our selection what not to miss when shopping for tyres in this size.
| # | Name | Price | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | £183 102 Y +3 More | |||
| 2 | £164 102 V | |||
| 3 | £183 102 Y | |||
| 4 | £229 98 Y +1 More | |||
| 5 | £196 102 H +8 More | |||
| 6 | £199 102 Y +2 More | |||
| 7 | £200 102 V +2 More | |||
| 8 | £181 102 H +4 More | |||
| 9 | £160 102 W +2 More | |||
| 10 | £169 102 Y +2 More | |||
| 11 | £189 102 W | |||
| 12 | £148 102 Y | |||
| 13 | £164 102 Y | |||
| 14 | £191 98 Y +5 More | |||
| 15 | £181 102 Y | |||
| 16 | £201 102 Y | |||
| 17 | £139 98 W | |||
| 18 | £193 102 Y | |||
| 19 | £194 98 Y +1 More | |||
| 20 | £137 102 Y | |||
| 21 | £466 102 Y | |||
| 22 | £131 102 Y | |||
| 23 | £292 102 Y +1 More | |||
| 24 | ||||
| 25 | £178 102 Y | |||
| 26 | £162 102 Y | |||