Apollo Alnac 4G
check Apollo Alnac 4G availability
Table of contents:
Pros and cons
- -
- -
Customer Popularity
60%
Customer Popularity
Based on 5 reviews
What customers like ...
-
Price 2
-
Good performance in water 1
What customers dislike ...
-
Too soft 1
-
Not stable on the road 1
Comparison
Wet road
Michelin Primacy 4+ 115%
Nokian Wetproof 110%
Uniroyal RainSport 5 110%
Apollo Alnac 4G 100%
Fulda EcoControl HP2 100%
Tomket Sport 95%
DoubleCoin DC99 80%
Dry road - safety
Michelin Primacy 4+ 120%
Nokian Wetproof 115%
Fulda EcoControl HP2 105%
Tomket Sport 105%
Uniroyal RainSport 5 105%
Apollo Alnac 4G 100%
DoubleCoin DC99 75%
Mileage
Aquaplaning
Uniroyal RainSport 5 125%
Fulda EcoControl HP2 120%
Michelin Primacy 4+ 110%
Nokian Wetproof 105%
Apollo Alnac 4G 100%
Tomket Sport 80%
DoubleCoin DC99 75%
Achievements
Best
Aquaplaning - cross
Adac 2023
Best
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Adac 2023
Best
Dry braking
Adac 2023
Best
Exterior noise
Adac 2023
Best
Wet braking
Adac 2023
Timeline
2015
Apollo Alnac 4G was tested 1x (Autobild)
2016
Apollo Alnac 4G was tested 1x (Autobild)
2018
Apollo Alnac 4G was tested 1x (Autobild)
2021
Apollo Alnac 4G was tested 3x (ADAC,...)
2023
Apollo Alnac 4G was tested 2x (Autoklub ČR,...)
Sizes
Apollo Alnac 4G is made in 32 sizes, starting from 185/60 R14 up to 205/55 R17.
16"
◀
▶
Filter:
show prices Similar tires
Comparison: tyres similar to Apollo Alnac 4G
Apollo Alnac 4G in tyre tests
All tyre tests where Apollo Alnac 4G was featured:All tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 104,7 | 106 | 103,4 | ||||
| Apollo Alnac 4G | 96,7 | 97,3 | 96,1 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
ADAC Summer tyre test 2023 205/55 R16
good
Ranked #27 of 50
Securing the 27th spot out of a group of 50 competitors, the Apollo Alnac 4G tire received a final rating of 'Good' but with several critical notes from the testers. Notably, its performance didn't impress on both dry and wet roads, leading to concerns regarding overall driving safety. The feedback from the steering was only satisfactory on dry surfaces, making it challenging for drivers to adjust the steering angle for corners immediately. Similarly, its handling at the limit and braking performance on dry roads were judged as satisfactory, though it managed to earn a 'good' rating in braking distance. Conditions on wet roads also did not highlight the tire's strengths; despite receiving a 'good' rating for its longitudinal aquaplaning behavior, its performance in lateral aquaplaning, wet braking, and handling fell into the satisfactory category. The grip level was described as mediocre, indicating fair but not exceptional, performance in managing longitudinal and lateral forces. Environmental performance and sustainability aspects also attracted criticism. The Apollo Alnac 4G was marked just satisfactory in environmental impact, mainly due to its relatively low predicted mileage which contributes negatively to its environmental rating. Furthermore, the wear it exhibits was also only satisfactory. On a positive note, its efficiency was praised due to lower weight and fuel consumption, securing a 'good' rating in this area. Nevertheless, the tire's sustainability, especially given its production in India, was rated as merely adequate. No specific attributes were identified as the absolute best or worst, indicating a performance that did not particularly stand out in any single discipline but instead showed a range of effectiveness and areas for improvement across various aspects of its performance and impact.
good
Ranked #27 of 50
Securing the 27th spot out of a group of 50 competitors, the Apollo Alnac 4G tire received a final rating of 'Good' but with several critical notes from the testers. Notably, its performance didn't impress on both dry and wet roads, leading to concerns regarding overall driving safety. The feedback from the steering was only satisfactory on dry surfaces, making it challenging for drivers to adjust the steering angle for corners immediately. Similarly, its handling at the limit and braking performance on dry roads were judged as satisfactory, though it managed to earn a 'good' rating in braking distance. Conditions on wet roads also did not highlight the tire's strengths; despite receiving a 'good' rating for its longitudinal aquaplaning behavior, its performance in lateral aquaplaning, wet braking, and handling fell into the satisfactory category. The grip level was described as mediocre, indicating fair but not exceptional, performance in managing longitudinal and lateral forces. Environmental performance and sustainability aspects also attracted criticism. The Apollo Alnac 4G was marked just satisfactory in environmental impact, mainly due to its relatively low predicted mileage which contributes negatively to its environmental rating. Furthermore, the wear it exhibits was also only satisfactory. On a positive note, its efficiency was praised due to lower weight and fuel consumption, securing a 'good' rating in this area. Nevertheless, the tire's sustainability, especially given its production in India, was rated as merely adequate. No specific attributes were identified as the absolute best or worst, indicating a performance that did not particularly stand out in any single discipline but instead showed a range of effectiveness and areas for improvement across various aspects of its performance and impact.
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Apollo Alnac 4G | 3,5 | 3,0 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,8 | 1,4 | 2,7 | 0,6 | |||
| Apollo Alnac 4G | 2,7 | 2,6 | 2,8 | 2,0 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Apollo Alnac 4G | 36,8 | 33,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,3 | 27 | |||||
| Apollo Alnac 4G | 37,8 | 28,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,6 | 27 | |||||
| Apollo Alnac 4G | 38,6 | 32,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2 | 1- | ||||
| Apollo Alnac 4G | 2 | 2 | 1- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
Test ratings distribution
| 100% (1x) | 95% (1x) | 85% (1x) |
|---|---|---|
| Exemplary | Good | Satisfactory |
| 1x | 1x | 1x |
Ratings x Wheel size
| R16 |
|---|
| 93.3% (3x) |
Ratings x Width
| 205/xx Rxx | 215/xx Rxx |
|---|---|
| 90% (2x) | 100% (1x) |
