Segment
1. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Upper-middle2. Zeetex WH 1000 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Zeetex) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Falken winter tyres are slightly better rated (58%) than Zeetex (21%). In this particular case, the Falken EuroWinter HS02 has a better rating of 65% compared to 21% of the Zeetex WH 1000. The first tyre test of Zeetex WH 1000 was done in 2020, compared to 2023 when was the Falken EuroWinter HS02 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the WH 1000 and the EuroWinter HS02 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Zeetex WH 1000
| Falken EuroWinter HS02
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R21 | ||
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Upper-middle2. Zeetex WH 1000 Lowcost
2. Zeetex WH 1000 34.6
1. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Satisfactory2. Zeetex WH 1000 Sufficient
1. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Satisfactory2. Zeetex WH 1000 Sufficient
Name | Winter | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1.6 | 1.9 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 2.9 | 1.7 | 2.0 |
Zeetex WH 1000 Rating: Sufficient | 3.4 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 3.2 | 3.1 | 3.5 |
Falken Eurowinter HS02 Rating: Satisfactory | 2.7 | 2.5 | 2.9 | 3.3 | 3.4 | 2.6 | 2.9 |
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
Zeetex WH 1000 | 42.3 | - | |||||
Falken Eurowinter HS02 | 38.3 | 30.7 | |||||
Show test details |