Segment
1. Yokohama W.drive V905 Upper-middle2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Upper-middle
Comparison: Yokohama W.drive V905 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP71
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Yokohama winter tyres are slightly better rated (46%) than Kumho (38%). But when it comes to comparing Yokohama W.drive V905 and Kumho WinterCraft WP71, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Yokohama W.drive V905 was done in 2015, compared to 2016 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP71 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the W.drive V905 and the WinterCraft WP71 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Yokohama W.drive V905
| Kumho WinterCraft WP71
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R19 | R16 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Yokohama W.drive V905 Satisfactory2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Yokohama W.drive V905 Conditionally recommended2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | ||
| Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: Good | dobré | 2- | 2- | 2- | 2 | ||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | 2+ | 3+ | 2 | 3 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | ||
| Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2- | 2- | 2 | 2- | ||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2- | 2- | 2 | 2+ | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,2 | 25,9 | |||||
| Yokohama W.drive V905 | 34,7 | 28,3 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP71 | 34,8 | 29,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
