Segment
1. Nokian WetProof Upper-middle
Comparison: Yokohama C.drive 2 AC02 vs. Nokian WetProof
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (66%) than Yokohama (42%). When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Yokohama C.drive 2 AC02 has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Nokian WetProof has A rating.
| # | Yokohama C.drive 2 AC02
| Nokian WetProof
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R17 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WetProof 5.64
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WetProof Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WetProof Recommended
