Segment
1. Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 Premium2. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Goodyear). Generally, Goodyear winter tyres are slightly better rated (86%) than Yokohama (46%). But when it comes to comparing Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 and Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 was done in 2019, compared to 2018 when was the Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the BluEarth winter WY01 and the Cargo UltraGrip 2 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 has B wet grip rating, whereas 60% of Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 has C rating.
# | Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01
| Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R16 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 Premium2. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Upper-middle
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Conditionally recommended2. Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 Still recommended
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Conditionally recommended2. Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 Still recommended
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | doporučeno | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | 4,2 | 3,2 | 3,0 | 2,5 | 2,5 | 2,5 | 2,0 |
Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | 2,8 | 3,9 | 3,7 | 2,5 | 2,8 | 2,5 | 2,2 |
Show test details |