• 14 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 vs. Nokian WR D4

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than Yokohama (46%). But when it comes to comparing Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 and Nokian WR D4, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 was done in 2018, compared to 2015 when was the Nokian WR D4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 195/65 R15 test, where both the BluEarth winter V905 and the WR D4 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 has C wet grip rating, whereas 97% of Nokian WR D4 has B rating.

# Yokohama BluEarth winter V905
/0%
Nokian WR D4
/0%

Add to comparison

Yokohama
Nokian
DimensionsR15 - R22 R13 - R20
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild
Name WetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in test1-2+11
Yokohama BluEarth winter V905
Rating: Satisfactory
22+ 3+2-
Nokian WR D4
Rating: Satisfactory
3 2-1 2
Show test details
ADAC
Name WetDrySnowIceNoiseWearFuel consumption
Best values in test2,12,01,82,33,01,01,7
Yokohama BluEarth winter V905
Rating: Satisfactory
2,52,93,12,53,42,02,0
Nokian WR D4
Rating: Satisfactory
2,92,51,8 2,53,43,01,7
Show test details