Segment
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Upper-middle2. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle
Comparison: Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 vs. Nokian WR D4
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (61%) than Yokohama (59%). But when it comes to comparing Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 and Nokian WR D4, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 was done in 2018, compared to 2015 when was the Nokian WR D4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 195/65 R15 test, where both the BluEarth winter V905 and the WR D4 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 has C wet grip rating, whereas 97% of Nokian WR D4 has B rating.
| # | Yokohama BluEarth winter V905
| Nokian WR D4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R22 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
1. Nokian WR D4 14.
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WR D4 6.04
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR D4 Highly recommended2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR D4 Recommended2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
1. Nokian WR D4 77%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
2. Nokian WR D4 75%
Wet braking
2. Nokian WR D4 73%
Wet circle cornering
2. Nokian WR D4 70%
Wet handling
2. Nokian WR D4 67%
Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
1. Nokian WR D4 79%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
2. Nokian WR D4 85%
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
1. Nokian WR D4 95%
Snow braking
1. Nokian WR D4 91%
Snow handling
1. Nokian WR D4 97%
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
2. Nokian WR D4 79%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1 | 1 | |||
| Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2+ | 3+ | 2- | |||
| Nokian WR D4 Rating: Satisfactory | 3 | 2- | 1 | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,1 | 2,0 | 1,8 | 2,3 | 3,0 | 1,0 | 1,7 |
| Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,5 | 2,9 | 3,1 | 2,5 | 3,4 | 2,0 | 2,0 |
| Nokian WR D4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 2,5 | 1,8 | 2,5 | 3,4 | 3,0 | 1,7 |
| Show test details | |||||||
