Segment
1. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Upper-middle2. Maxxis Premitra HP5 Lowcost
Comparison: Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 vs. Maxxis Premitra HP5
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Maxxis). Generally, Maxxis summer tyres are slightly better rated (51%) than Yokohama (30%). The first tyre test of Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 was done in 2022, compared to 2017 when was the Maxxis Premitra HP5 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the BLUEARTH-GT AE51 and the Premitra HP5 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51
| Maxxis Premitra HP5
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R19 | R15 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Maxxis Premitra HP5 Very good2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Maxxis Premitra HP5 Conditionally recommended2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 146 | 134 | |||||
| Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Rating: Sufficient | 91 | 113 | |||||
| Maxxis Premitra HP5 Rating: Highly recommended | 146 | 106 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 | 37,7 | 32,2 | |||||
| Maxxis Premitra HP5 | 37,3 | 28,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||