Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Premium2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Upper-middle
Comparison: Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 vs. Bridgestone Turanza 6
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from Japan. Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (86%) than Yokohama (57%). The first tyre test of Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 was done in 2022, compared to 2023 when was the Bridgestone Turanza 6 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 98% of Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (79%) of the Bridgestone Turanza 6 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51
| Bridgestone Turanza 6
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R19 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Exemplary2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Sufficient
