Segment
1. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 Upper-middle2. Kumho Ecsta HS51 Upper-middle
Comparison: Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS51
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho summer tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Yokohama (42%). Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2019 235/45 R18 test, where both the Bluearth AE-50 and the Ecsta HS51 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
| Kumho Ecsta HS51
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R19 | R14 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta HS51 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta HS51 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 277 | 142 | 135 | ||||
| Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 | 235 | 114 | 121 | ||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS51 | 181 | 73 | 108 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,6 | 27 | |||||
| Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 | 36,4 | 30,5 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS51 | 38,6 | 29,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
