Segment
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 Premium2. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Upper-middle
Comparison: Yokohama Advan Sport V105 vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 4
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Yokohama (42%). The first tyre test of Yokohama Advan Sport V105 was done in 2015, compared to 2017 when was the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 245/45 R18 test, where both the Advan Sport V105 and the Pilot Sport 4 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 89% of Yokohama Advan Sport V105 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (86%) of the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Yokohama Advan Sport V105
| Michelin Pilot Sport 4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R23 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 Highly recommended2. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Yokohama Advan Sport V105 | 35,3 | 34,7 | |||||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 4 | 32,1 | 29,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||