Comparison: Yokohama Advan Sport V105 vs. Falken Azenis FK510
Table of contents:
| # | Yokohama Advan Sport V105
| Falken Azenis FK510
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R23 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Taking a comparative glance at Yokohama Advan Sport V105 and Falken Azenis FK510, both reputable summer tyre models, there are several points to take into account.
Although there is no relative data for the Yokohama Advan Sport V105 rating in%, the manufacturer, Yokohama, is still consistently well-regarded in the field. This particular model has yet to be replaced by a newer iteration and draws its strengths from the Yokohama legacy.
Meanwhile, the Falken Azenis FK510 sports a commendable rating of 71%. Manufactured in both Japan and Turkey, this product is a testament to Falken's seasoned expertise. It's also worth noting that the Falken Azenis FK510 has been replaced by the Falken Azenis FK520, indicating a continuous quest for advancement.
In terms of rankings in mutual tyre tests, Autobild ranked the Yokohama Advan Sport V105 26th out of 50 tyres, while the Falken Azenis FK510 managed to snag a much more favorable 15th place. The Falken model outscored the Yokohama variant in several areas including comfort, wet handling and braking, exterior noise, price/value, and rolling resistance.
A follow-up test by GTÜ further emphasized the Falken Azenis FK510's superior performance, ranking it 5th out of 14 tyres, as opposed to the 11th place earned by the Yokohama Advan Sport V105.
To summarize, although the Yokohama Advan Sport V105 did not perform as impressive as its counterpart in the tests, it remains a dependable option for those who swear by the Yokohama brand. However, for those who prioritize test performance and optimum features, the Falken Azenis FK510 (or its newer version, the FK520) may prove to be a better fit.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Falken Azenis FK510 69 dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | |||||
| Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Satisfactory | 1- | 2- | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Yokohama Advan Sport V105 | 35,3 | 34,7 | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 | 36 | 30,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 278 | 146 | 143 | 25 | 10 | ||
| Yokohama Advan Sport V105 | 209 | 93 | 116 | 4 | 8 | ||
| Falken Azenis FK510 | 244 | 114 | 130 | 16 | 10 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
