Segment
1. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 Upper-middle2. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle
# | Yokohama Advan Fleva V701
| Falken Azenis FK510
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R17 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Our tests showed varying results between the two models with the Yokohama tyre earning a rating of 46% and the Falken tyre emerging ahead with a 74% rating. These are both summer tyre options, thus making it even more interesting for users who need to make a pick for this season.
One of the definitive tests we conducted was one from Autobild. In this test, out of 52 tyres, the Falken Azenis FK510 outshone the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 by securing an impressive 3rd position while the Yokohama tyre came 15th.
When it comes to the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701, it’s fair to say that despite it’s middle field position in tests, it could have some redeeming features that some drivers may appreciate. However, this tyre hasn't been replaced by a newer model thus far, leaving the purchasers to solely rely on the performance merits of this model.
On the other hand, the Falken Azenis FK510 has managed to make quite a splash in the industry. Its promising performance in tests and preferred rating demonstrate its superior competencies admirably well. Moreover, Falken also offers an updated model, the Falken Azenis FK520, which replaces the FK510.
After comparing both tyres, our verdict indicates that the Falken Azenis FK510 tyre would be the superior choice thanks to better testing results and the availability of an updated, potentially better, model. Meanwhile, the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 is a solid but not particularly standout option.
At the end of the day, a driver's choice boils down to personal preference, car compatibility and driving conditions they'll face. Both of these tyres represent commendable options for any user looking to enhance their drive experience during the summer months.
1. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 Upper-middle2. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Exemplary2. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 Satisfactory
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Recommended2. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 Conditionally recommended
2. Falken Azenis FK510 69 dB
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | příkladné | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2- | 2+ | 2 | |||
Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 1- | 2+ | 2 | |||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 | 35,2 | 32,9 | |||||
Falken Azenis FK510 | 36 | 29 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | příkladné | 1- | 1- | 1 | |||
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | 3+ | 2+ | 2 | |||
Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 1- | 2+ | 2 | |||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,1 | 34,6 | |||||
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 | 34,9 | 40,2 | |||||
Falken Azenis FK510 | 35,5 | 34,8 | |||||
Show test details |