Comparison: Vredestein Ultrac Vorti vs. Pirelli P ZERO
Table of contents:
| # | Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
| Pirelli P ZERO
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R24 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
In today's comparison, we're putting two popular summer tyres head-to-head: The Vredestein Ultrac Vorti, and the Pirelli P ZERO.
According to our database, our ratings have the Pirelli P ZERO slightly ahead with a score of 61% compared to 55% for the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti. Knowing that, let's still dig deeper into the specific strengths and weaknesses.
The Vredestein Ultrac Vorti, manufactured in the Netherlands, shows its true potential especially in wet conditions, performing exceptionally well during tests in wet braking, wet handling, and aquaplaning. It also impresses with its quietness, having been complimented for its low exterior noise according to the tests by ADAC. However, it falls behind in ADAC tests for dry braking and handling.
The Italian-made Pirelli P ZERO, on the other hand, shines in its performance in dry handling and braking as tested by Autobild and ADAC, suggesting fantastic control and safety. Autobild also notes its excellent wet performance, while Gute-Fahrt praises its ability for wet circle cornering. However, ADAC tests showed no standout performance for mileage, which gives Vredestein Ultrac Vorti an edge.
In terms of position in mutual tests, the Pirelli P ZERO generally ranked higher. Autobild puts the P ZERO as fourth out of 53 tyres tested, while the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti scored ninth. In ADAC's test of 16 tyres, Pirelli acquired the third place compared to the fourth for Vredestein. Gute-Fahrt ranks Pirelli seventh out of 10 tyres, while Vredestein ended in tenth. Only Automotorsport has the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti ahead with it ending in fourth compared to Pirelli's fifth-place finish.
To sum up, both Vredestein and Pirelli offer great summer tyres, but the Pirelli P ZERO comes out slightly ahead in overall test results, particularly excelling in dry conditions and handling. But, those looking for better mileage and quieter drives might find the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti to be a more suitable choice.
Note: Neither of these tyres has been replaced with a newer model thus far.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
1. Pirelli P ZERO 100%
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
1. Pirelli P ZERO 100%
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti | 33,4 | 31,3 | |||||
| Pirelli P ZERO | 34,8 | 34,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,7 | 1,3 | 2,8 | 2,0 | 1,6 | ||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,5 | 2,9 | 2,0 | 2,4 | ||
| Pirelli P ZERO Rating: Satisfactory | 1,8 | 1,3 | 2,9 | 3,0 | 2,7 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Rating: Good | |||||||
| Pirelli P ZERO Rating: Good + | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Rating: Good | 2 | 2+ | 2- | ||||
| Pirelli P ZERO Rating: Good | 1- | 2+ | 3+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 1- | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2+ | |||||
| Pirelli P ZERO Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 1- | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti | 35,3 | 30,8 | |||||
| Pirelli P ZERO | 35,1 | 28,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,4 | 9,8 | 9,3 | 10 | |||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti | 6,9 | 6,6 | 7,7 | 5,5 | |||
| Pirelli P ZERO | 8,3 | 8,5 | 8,6 | 5,9 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,4 | 9,6 | 9,5 | 10 | 10 | ||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Rating: Recommended | 8,5 | 8,1 | 9,5 | 5 | 7 | ||
| Pirelli P ZERO Rating: Recommended | 8,3 | 8,6 | 8,3 | 7 | 7 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,2 | 0,8 | 3,0 | 1,3 | ||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Rating: Good | 2,5 | 1,3 | 2,3 | 3,1 | 2,5 | ||
| Pirelli P ZERO Rating: Good | 2,0 | 1,9 | 2,3 | 3,1 | 2,1 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
