Segment
1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R Premium2. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Vredestein (55%). In this particular case, the Falken Azenis FK510 has a better rating of 71% compared to 50% of the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R. The first tyre test of Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R was done in 2018, compared to 2016 when was the Falken Azenis FK510 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 265/35 R20 test, where both the Ultrac Vorti R and the Azenis FK510 were tested.
# | Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R
| Falken Azenis FK510
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R19 - R21 | R17 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R Premium2. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle
1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R Exemplary2. Falken Azenis FK510 Exemplary
2. Falken Azenis FK510 Recommended
1. Falken Azenis FK510 69 dB
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | příkladné | 1 | 1- | ||||
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R Rating: Good | dobré | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2- | 2 | ||||
Show test details |