Segment
1. Vredestein Ultrac Pro Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Triangle). Generally, Vredestein summer tyres are slightly better rated (34%) than Triangle (32%). In this particular case, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro has a better rating of 71% compared to 21% of the Triangle Effexsport TH202. The first tyre test of Vredestein Ultrac Pro was done in 2024, compared to 2025 when was the Triangle Effexsport TH202 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 245/35 R19 test, where both the Ultrac Pro and the Effexsport TH202 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Vredestein Ultrac Pro
| Triangle Effexsport TH202
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R18 - R45 | ||
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Vredestein Ultrac Pro Premium
1. Vredestein Ultrac Pro Exemplary2. Triangle Effexsport TH202 Conditionally recommended
2. Triangle Effexsport TH202 Conditionally recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | |||||
Vredestein Ultrac Pro Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | |||||
Triangle Effexsport TH202 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3+ | 3+ | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 279 | 141 | 139 | ||||
Vredestein Ultrac Pro Rating: - | 230 | 115 | 115 | ||||
Triangle EffeXSport TH202 Rating: - | 167 | 77 | 90 | ||||
Show test details |