Segment
1. Vredestein Ultrac Pro Premium2. Linglong Sport Master Lowcost
Comparison: Vredestein Ultrac Pro vs. Linglong Sport Master
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein) against a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Linglong). Generally, Vredestein summer tyres are slightly better rated (55%) than Linglong (44%). In this particular case, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro has a better rating of 87% compared to 64% of the Linglong Sport Master. The first tyre test of Vredestein Ultrac Pro was done in 2024, compared to 2023 when was the Linglong Sport Master first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the Ultrac Pro and the Sport Master were tested.
| # | Vredestein Ultrac Pro
| Linglong Sport Master
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R18 - R45 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Linglong Sport Master 11.67
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Ultrac Pro Exemplary2. Linglong Sport Master Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Linglong Sport Master Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Dry braking
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.4 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Pro | 35.0 | 31.2 | |||||
| Linglong Sport Master | 34.2 | 27.4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
