Segment
1. Vredestein Sportrac 5 Premium2. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium
Comparison: Vredestein Sportrac 5 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
Table of contents:
| # | Vredestein Sportrac 5
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
The comparison between the Vredestein Sportrac 5 and the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 reveals interesting insights about their performance, strength, and weaknesses. Both summer tyres were evaluated on different parameters across multiple tyre tests and this review aims to summarize these findings.
Starting with the Vredestein Sportrac 5, this tyre received an overall rating of 58%. It didn't feature any notable strengths in the Autobild test, placing 11th out of 50 tyres. Its best performance was in the ACE test where it ranked 6th, mainly due to its effective dry driving behavior. However, it fell to the 8th spot in the ADAC test.
On the other hand, the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125, which has now been replaced by a newer model, boasted a higher overall rating of 72%. In the Autobild test, this tyre outperformed the competition, taking the 2nd spot, particularly excelling in dry handling. However, it slipped to the 14th position in the ADAC test, but it rebounded in the ACE test where it ranked 4th, showing strengths against aquaplaning, dry driving behavior, and producing lower exterior noise.
In conclusion, it is clear from the comparison that both tyres have their strengths and weaknesses. The Vredestein Sportrac 5 performs consistently across different tests but does not stand out in any particular area. The Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125, however, displays strong performance in areas such as dry handling but its performance varies significantly across different tests. Therefore, the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 could be a better choice for those prioritizing dry handling and noise efficiency.
For more information about these tyres, visit the respective manufacturer’s page, Vredestein and Hankook.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Conditionally recommended2. Vredestein Sportrac 5 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 2+ | 1- | 1 | |||
| Vredestein Sportrac 5 Rating: Good | dobré | 2 | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 2+ | 1- | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
| Vredestein Sportrac 5 | 36,8 | 37 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 | 34,5 | 35,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 2,0 | 1,6 | 3,0 | 1,0 | 1,7 | |
| Vredestein Sportrac 5 Rating: Sufficient | dostatečné | 2,7 | 1,7 | 3,1 | 1,5 | 1,7 | |
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Good | dobré | 2,5 | 1,6 | 3,4 | 2,5 | 2,1 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Rating | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 153 | velmi doporučeno | 42 | 37 | 14 | 6 | |
| Vredestein Sportrac 5 Rating: Recommended | 137 | doporučeno | 54 | 47 | 16 | 6 | |
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Recommended | 144 | doporučeno | 57 | 47 | 16 | 9 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | chvalitebné | 1,9 | 1,5 | 0,5 | 1,5 | 1,6 | |
| Vredestein Sportrac 5 Rating: Good | dobré | 2,8 | 2,6 | 1,0 | 3,2 | 2,0 | |
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Good | dobré | 3,3 | 1,8 | 2,5 | 3,0 | 2,2 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 2+ | 1- | 1 | |||
| Vredestein Sportrac 5 Rating: Recommended | doporučeno | 2- | 2- | 2 | |||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 2+ | 1- | 1- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,6 | 27 | |||||
| Vredestein Sportrac 5 | 37,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 | 34,6 | 27,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
