Segment
1. Uniroyal SNOW MAX 2 Upper-middle2. BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER Upper-middle
Comparison: Uniroyal SNOW MAX 2 vs. BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
Table of contents:
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from USA. Uniroyal is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Uniroyal (69%). But when it comes to comparing Uniroyal SNOW MAX 2 and BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the SNOW MAX 2 and the ACTIVAN WINTER were tested.
| # | Uniroyal SNOW MAX 2
| BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R16 | R14 - R16 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Uniroyal SNOW MAX 2 Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Uniroyal SNOW MAX 2 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
| Uniroyal SNOW MAX 2 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3,1 | 4,2 | 2,2 | 2,8 | 3,9 | 3,0 | 2,6 |
| BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER Rating: Not recommended | 4,9 | 3,4 | 3,1 | 2,3 | 3,3 | 2,0 | 1,7 |
| Show test details | |||||||
