Segment
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle2. Tristar Ecopower 4 Lowcost
Comparison: Tristar Ecopower 4 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4
Table of contents:
| # | Tristar Ecopower 4
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
The Tristar Ecopower 4, a summer tyre, is a model offering a lower rating in our catalogue with a score of 42%. In the Autobild tyre test, the Tristar Ecopower 4 did not have any specific position among the total of 51 tyres put to the test. However, in GTÜ tests, it managed to secure the 7th position among 8 total tyres. Details of its strengths and weaknesses was not explicitly mentioned but considering its position in the test, it can be concluded it didn't outshine its competitors much. You can find more about the Tristar Ecopower 4 and its features on the manufacturer's website.
On the contrary, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4, also a summer tyre, demonstrates a superior rating of 76% on our site. In the same Autobild test, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 fell into the 12th place, and astonishingly grabbed the 1st place in the GTÜ test. Its strengths include good aquaplaning safety, short dry braking distances, and good comfortable ride. However, the tyre was marked down for marginal wet grip, delayed steering response, and understeering behavior on dry tracks. Compared to the Tristar Ecopower 4, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 highlighted better performance overall in the test conditions. You can refer to the Kleber manufacturer page to learn more about the model and its features.
In conclusion, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 outperforms the Tristar Ecopower 4 based on the provided test results and ratings. While the Tristar Ecopower 4 may offer certain benefits, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4's overall performance, safety features, and comfort earn it a higher recommendation.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.58
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended2. Tristar Ecopower 4 Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended2. Tristar Ecopower 4 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Tristar Ecopower 4 | 39,5 | 32,1 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 37,4 | 28,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | velmi doporučeno | 61 | 48 | 18 | 8 | ||
| Tristar Ecopower 4 Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | 46 | 40 | 16 | 6 | ||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Highly recommended | velmi doporučeno | 61 | 48 | 17 | 8 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
