Segment
1. Toyo Celsius AS2 Upper-middle2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Upper-middle
Comparison: Toyo Celsius AS2 vs. Kleber Quadraxer 3
Table of contents:
| # | Toyo Celsius AS2
| Kleber Quadraxer 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Let's start our comparison with the Toyo Celsius AS2 tyre, a versatile all-rounder hailing from Japan. According to our test data, it scores a good 54% on our rating scale. Across various tests, the Toyo Celsius AS2 holds the 12th position twice from AUTOBILD. While it has certain advantages such as comfort, value for price, and exterior noise, it also exhibits some weaknesses such as low levels of grip in wet and snowy conditions, below average comfort, and high rolling resistance. The tyre's performance in terms of aquaplaning resistance is acceptable. Visit the Toyo manufacturer site for more details.
On the other hand, we have the Kleber Quadraxer 3 tyre. Its outstanding performance is reflected in our 87% rating. The Quadraxer 3 improves upon its previous model, the Kleber Quadraxer 2, and offers even better features. It delivers reliable performance across all conditions, securing the 7th and 4th positions respectively in AUTOBILD’s tyre tests. Its strengths include comfort, exterior noise, and enhanced capabilities dealing with snow traction and cornering. While it tends to understeer on a dry track, its overall performance remains impressive. It has favourable aquaplaning properties and quite short dry braking distances. Learn more about Kleber tyres at the Kleber site.
In summary, while both the Toyo Celsius AS2 and Kleber Quadraxer 3 offer all-rounded advantages, the latter shines brighter overall according to numerous tests. Its excellent comfort, snow handling abilities, and dry braking set it apart from the Toyo Celsius AS2.
The Toyo Celsius AS2 is more suited to those seeking reasonable performance with a tight budget. However, for drivers who prioritize enhanced performance, especially in snowy conditions, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 would be the better choice. Both tyres have their strengths and weaknesses, and this comparison should help in choosing the right one according to individual preferences and requirements.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Toyo Celsius AS2 11.22
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Highly recommended2. Toyo Celsius AS2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Toyo Celsius AS2 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | ||
| Toyo Celsius AS2 Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | 3 | 3 | 3+ | 4 | ||
| Kleber Quadraxer 3 Rating: Good | dobré | 2 | 2- | 2+ | 3+ | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36.8 | 50.5 | |||||
| Toyo Celsius AS2 | 39.9 | 59.0 | |||||
| Kleber Quadraxer 3 | 38.5 | 58.4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | ||||||
| Toyo Celsius AS2 Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | ||||||
| Kleber Quadraxer 3 Rating: Good | dobré | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Toyo Celsius AS2 | |||||||
| Kleber Quadraxer 3 Rating: Highly recommended | vysoce doporučeno | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37.7 | 45 | |||||
| Toyo Celsius AS2 | 40.9 | 50.6 | |||||
| Kleber Quadraxer 3 | 38.3 | 48.5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | ||||||
| Toyo Celsius AS2 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | ||||||
| Kleber Quadraxer 3 Rating: Good | dobré | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,9 | 44,4 | |||||
| Toyo Celsius AS2 | 43,5 | 53,2 | |||||
| Kleber Quadraxer 3 | 40,3 | 49,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | uspokojivé | 1- | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||
| Toyo Celsius AS2 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3+ | 2- | 2 | 1 | ||
| Kleber Quadraxer 3 Rating: Good | dobré | 2 | 2+ | 2+ | 2- | ||
| Show test details | |||||||